[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: Simple problem - complicated solution - perfor
Hello all.
I had already seen FXSL before posting to this list. When coming to performance, AFAICT, O(n) may seem worth using, except for the fact that I am thinking of using this on a browser-side computation model. That meaning: I have the XML file and the XSLT file on a server. The XML is dynamically generated, and includes a "call" to the XSLT file. When thinking of FXSL, the size of the "functions" itself makes it not worth using. I have not deeply studied what was proposed for O(n log n), but that may be interesting if it is simple. Otherwise, the --very simple-- O(n2) approach will do, as my data sets will invariantly have 10 elements each, which should not be a big deal. IIRC, O(n) should be equal to O(n log n) for a 10 sample data model, and O(n2) is worse, but only 10 to 100 (1 order of magnitude). The processing time used on it may be worth the network transfer time over a 56K analog modem (yes, still more used in Europe than DSL lines). I will study that, and maybe do some performance tests. It seems to me that I will get some interesting results. Thank you very much, especially for such a quick answer. Antonio Fiol Bonnín Dimitre Novatchev wrote: Stuart, Attachment:
smime.p7s
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|