RE: Higher-order function support as means to reduce the "st

> Based on my brief example it is clear, that the standard
> language can be kept small,
> allowing at the same time any desired functionality to be
> easily implemented by
> programmers, based on higher-order function support.
>
Let me say that I agree with you entirely on this. I wish I could convince
my colleagues.

There are complexities, I'm sure, in extending the type system to handle
higher-order functions. But I'm sure that given a will, these could be
resolved.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list