Re: XPath 2.0

David C. wrote:
>> I might be reading it wrong, but I think that the << operator is
>> supposed to cover the combination of ancestor and preceding axes.
>> So if you did:
>
> more than that I think: document order orders nodes across documents
> (in an implementation way) whereas nodes in different documents are
> not comparable with orderings based on an axes.

Coo.

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list