[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: Re: . in for)
> Also, as XPath gets more complicated, XPointer gets more complicated, > doesn't it? There seems to be a lot of stuff in XPath 2.0 that is not > really needed for linking between documents. Even XPath 1.0 makes > XPointers unnecessarily complicated; due to that, I think > there will be > a lot of subsetting of XPointer to filter out complicated XPath stuff. Yes; we have been assuming that there would probably be a need for some kind of XPath 2.0 subset to meet the needs of applications like XPointer. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|