[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Choice of a XSL-Fo processor
I have to do a comparison between the different existing XSL-Fo processors. I focused on these ones: -FOP, Apache -XEP, RenderX -Antenna House XSL Processor -PassiveTeX Could you give me their "good and bad parts"? Who support them? What are the aims of each one about the XSL specification? Finally, is there any other good XSL-Fo processors? I understood that these 4 XSL-Fo processors were all compliant to the basic conformance level in the W3C recommendation, and also to some of the objects and properties of the extended level. I would like to have your opinions. I have to transform an XML document into a PDF file, using a specific model of presentation (first page, contents, headers, titles, ...) Regards ----------------------- Aurelien Gisbert Engineer student in the INSA of Lyon, France Internee in the SNCF, France (working with Alain Herbuel, in the DSIT-EX section) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|