RE: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: comments on

Jeni wrote:

> > this works surprisingly well in omnimark, although I thought it odd
> > when I first saw it. It also allows you to grab nested strings
> > rather than having to reconcatenate #1 #2 etc for example (in a
> > mixture of omnimark and sed/perl syntax)
> 
> It does sound really neat - I always get lost about which bracket I'm
> on in a regular expression!

If its any help, the Omnimark 'way of working' is so straightforward
that even I got it within minutes.

It ?was? a very widespread tool for uptransforms, i.e. going into
XML/SGML, and has the power to do it easily.

I'd go for that, on simplicity alone.

Regards DaveP

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list