RE: XPath 2.0

Michael Kay wrote:
> I must say my personal preference is for "<<", simply on the
> grounds that it
> means exactly one of the conditions a<<b, a==b, and a>>b will be true
> (assuming a and b are single nodes)

Does anyone on this list care that "<<", when used in XSLT, would have to be
written as "a&lt;&lt;b"?

Evan


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list