[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: RE: Higher-Order Functions in XPath 2.0
> To be strict, it seems that $a[$i], where $a contains a > sequence (not a > node-set) is not valid syntax according to the current WD. Or am I > wrong? > The semantic rules in the XPath 2.0 WD do currently say that $a in $a[$i] must consist entirely of nodes, but that restriction was not intended - regard it as an error in the document. The restriction was intended to apply only to the operands of the "/" operator, but found its way to the wrong place in the spec. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|