[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: . in for
[snipped a very nice and perfectly understandable argumentation for a mapping operator] > I can see two drawbacks to using a simple mapping operator rather than > a for expression, because the context item is used rather than there > being explicit variable bindings for range variables: > > - you cannot iterate over several sequences at the same time > - you cannot have right operands that use the value of the item from > the left operand within a predicate Jeni, This is the only part of your message, which seems not to be 100% clear. Could you, please, provide concrete examples (expressions) that would be illegal/would not work? Cheers, Dimitre. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|