text()" vs. "node()"

[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs. "node()"

Subject: Re: Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs. "node()"
From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 11:28:46 +0100
Re:  Re: Re: "*|@*|text()" vs. "node()"
> XML, for historical reasons rooted in typographical markup, distinguishes
> "content" from "properties". Content is the information intended for the
> reader, properties are extra information intended for the software
> processing that information. This history explains why we have the split
> between elements and attributes (logically, attributes aren't necessary at
> all), and explains why they are treated differently in the object model.
>
> Mike Kay

but unfortunately this model is not 100% appropriate ( as all models ) for
certain situations, but can still adapt to the odd cases.

for ex. RDF with dublin core attributes, buried in <head></head> is a good
example of when all content must be attributes.

cheers, jim fuller






 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.