RE: working with XSLFO: validation.

I think there are definitely several scenarios in which validation of
XSLFO would be desirable.  Doesn't the popularity of the 'RenderX trial
version' of a DTD clearly show that this is a real world need?

Max

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Francis
Norton
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:38 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  working with XSLFO: validation.


Tobias Reif wrote:
> 
> >> Scenario 2.
<snip schema-guided XML editor>

Scenario 3.

I'd like to offer another scenario - using schema-guided editors to help
create XSLT transforms that consume XSLFO. I've been playing with XML
Spy 4 beta 2 and it has support for building mySchema -> HTML
transforms, using an XML Schema and an instance doc as inputs. It's a
great idea. I'd like to be able to generate mySourceSchema ->
myTargetSchema transforms the same way, this is a very good start. 

As a tool development activity, this scenario would presumably be in
scope?

Francis.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list