Re: This can't be right, XML with no root element: Sax

Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>(1.1) An image element
> 
> The XSLT 1.0 specification is clear that the output does not have to be a
> well-formed XML document, only a well-formed external general parsed entity.
> Which means, in effect, something that would be a well-formed document if
> you put a start and end tag around it. Whether you or I happen to like this
> spec is somewhat irrelevant.
> 
out of curiousity, would the above output be a well-formed external
general parsed entity, given that it starts with an xml declaration?

Francis.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list