XSLT Standard Library License

As a follow-up to my announcement about the XSLT Standard Library,
I'd like to start a (hopefully brief) discussion about the choice
of license.  I hope my choice of license is as least contentious
as possible.

>From my point-of-view it came down to two options: LGPL or MIT/Berkeley.

GPL is out because most commercial concerns won't touch GPL'd
code due to its viral nature.

Although MIT/Berkeley style licenses are good from the commercial
standpoint (they're basically "anything goes, just don't blame me
when it goes wrong"), I know that some folks are not keen on
contributing
code under such a license.

So the choice of LGPL I believe represents a middle ground:
commercial use is OK, but changes to the library itself have to be
fed back to the project.

Does anyone have any dissenting thoughts on this?

-- 
Steve Ball            | waX Me Lyrical XML Editor | Training & Seminars
Zveno Pty Ltd         |     Web Tcl Complete      |      XML XSL
http://www.zveno.com/ |      TclXML TclDOM        | Tcl, Web Development
Steve.Ball@xxxxxxxxx  +---------------------------+---------------------
Ph. +61 2 6242 4099   |   Mobile (0413) 594 462   | Fax +61 2 6242 4099

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list