RE: XSLT 1.1 comments

> > > Agreed. Anyone interested in doing a "lint" style
> > transform for checking
> > > transform portability?
> >
> > Is there really anything other than don't use
> > extension functions and
> > try not to use disable-output-encoding?

Trouble is, some of these features are not statically detectable. For
example you could say that roman numbering produces results that are largely
undefined, but it's only likely to be problematic for numbers above 1000.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list