RE: Re: FXPath - A comment on EXSL

> From: David Rosenborg [mailto:david.rosenborg@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 28 February 2001 14:45

> Yes, and I think user defined extension functions sits almost 
> right in the middle of
> the two. I think that's why we can find sensible arguments 
> for choosing
> either syntax for this purpose. However, as you know, I think most
> of the extension functions will deal with XPath types and should
> therefore be implemented in an XPath fashion.

Simple question just on this one. Would a resultant stylesheet using
this form still be a valid XML document, as per today?

Regards DaveP

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list