[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: a novice's question
> Here's a novice's question: Rubbish, it's pretty deep. > > From reading the XSL spec I got the idea that XSLT has a > fairly complete set > of programming features (conditions, loops, etc.) but is not > concerned with > any visual formatting issues. Now, that's logical. But on the > other end of > the rope there's XSL FO which offers a good inventory of formatting > parameters, but has no programming abilities at all. This > seems much less logical to me. I think you're absolutely right that the simple two-stage approach "transform, then format" won't always work. Typically this gets solved for 95% of cases by using a few handy features in the formatting stage, e.g. the ability to fill in page numbers, running heads, and so on. More complex cases can probably be handled by doing another transformation after the formatting, but it would be interesting to explore situations where this is necessary. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|