RE: XSLT conformance of MSXML2

 Linda van den Brink wrote:

>I already posted a wish list saying that they should implement 
>calling named
>templates, and the preceding-sibling, preceding, following-sibling, and
>following Xpath axes. Whereupon Microsoft developer Jonathan 
>Marsh asked me
>which of these four I have the greatest need for, or are they 
>all equally
>important. What do you all think? Maybe the -sibling ones are 
>more widely
>used, e.g. in sorting/grouping?

Agreed. The order might be
named templates, preceeding-sibling, following-sibling, preceeding,
following, namespace.

DaveP


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list