[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)

Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
From: "Ed Nixon" <ed.nixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 18:54:54 -0400
RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
I keep waiting for someone to ask the (perhaps stupid) question: "Is this
'problem' not something that RDF is designed or at least capable of dealing
with?" I have been conditioned to think of RDF as a kind of super-DTD but
obviously it is more general and more malleable.

Why not?

	...edN

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Elliotte Rusty
> Harold
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 1999 9:12 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken)
>
>
> At 4:00 PM -0400 4/6/99, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
> >That's pretty much what an XPDL file looks like, with hrefs
> pointing to all
> >sizable chunks of information.  It's not a manifest for a particular
> >document (it's referenced by the document, rather than it
> referencing the
> >document), but that functionality wouldn't be difficult to add for
> >particular use-cases.
> >
>
> I really wonder about this approach. It strikes me that the
> document should
> be the document, and all this differet information should
> come from outside
> of it. I really don't like the idea of embedding even a
> simple link to the
> XPDS stuff inside the document. I guess I'm prejudiced here
> based on my
> experience with style sheets where <?xml-stylesheet?> has
> caused me nothing
> but trouble. I hate having to edit my documents to apply a
> different style
> sheet, especially when I frequently want to switch between
> more than one
> style sheet for a single document.
>
> What about using a standard naming convention for attaching
> XPDL info to
> documents? Or HTTP headers? Possibly but not necessarily
> backed up by a
> processing instruction, where the processing instruction has
> the lowest
> priority?  My fundamental problem here is that I view this as
> a sort of
> layered approach, and I don't want the lower layers (XML) to have any
> knowledge of the upper layers (XLL, XSL, XPDL, etc.)
>
>
> +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
> | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer |
> +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
> |        XML: Extensible Markup Language (IDG Books 1998)            |
> |   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764531999/cafeaulaitA/   |
> +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
> |  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://sunsite.unc.edu/javafaq/ |
> |  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://sunsite.unc.edu/xml/     |
> +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
>
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.