[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful
Jonathan Borden wrote: > > So you are saying that it is possible to create a transformation which > takes an arbitrary XFO -> XHTML and back i.e. No. I only claim that that is the case for *abstract* information. I can't provide a generalized definition of abstract information but in this context we can use this one: "the information required to drive non-graphical renditions of the information." >From a graphical point of view, XFOs have a few features that XHTML+CSS do not. I cannot enumerate these exhaustively, however. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Microsoft spokesman Ian Hatton admits that the Linux system would have performed better had it been tuned." "Future press releases on the issue will clearly state that the research was sponsored by Microsoft." http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/1999/9904221410.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|