[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Fw: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL?
Hi Oren. I almost dismissed what you said here as a simple upbeat view point until I actually thought about it and realised it was quite a novel requirement, and a very shrewed statement, that anything implimented in the XSL Rec would have to go into the XQL Rec. I love the idea, but can you see the XQL community going for it? (remembering that we have some very big, very conservative players regarding XQL as their "home turf"). Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 03/09/99 12:55:00 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Fw: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL? I'd rather see it as locking XQL to be a superset of XSL, instead. I strongly believe that this should be a requirement of any proposed XQL language. Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|