[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why transformation?

Subject: Re: Why transformation?
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 09:25:06 -0500
Re: Why transformation?
Daniel Glazman wrote:
> Paul Prescod wrote:
> > Presumably people who have
> > looked at the issue more closely than I have decided that CSS's formatting
> > model was not sufficient.
> Strange assumption, indeed. The CSS and XSL formatting models are currently under
> harmonization and it seems quite impossible to harmonize two things if
> there is a too big difference between them.

I don't know how I could have stated this any more clearly, but: if CSS's
model was sufficient, they would have just used CSS's model and there
would have been no two things to harmonize, right? I didn't claim that
CSS's formatting model was miles away from XSL's. I merely said that it
*was not sufficient* (in the eyes of the people who decided not to use

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Bart: Dad, do I really have to brush my teeth?
Homer: No, but at least wash your mouth out with soda.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.