Re: Language choice (was: Re: Interactive XML)

Play the video

Subject: Re: Language choice (was: Re: Interactive XML)
From: "Bill Lindsey" <blindsey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 10:42:41 +0000

I've looked, but I can't find it.  Shouldn't there be something in the
requirements draft that I could point to and say "Aha, this is why
XML + Javascript (er, ECMAScript) syntax is a better choice than Scheme
syntax"?  In my opinion, if the choice is to be considered justified, 
the basis ought to be more explicit.

Cheers, 

Bill


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Interactive XML), (continued) Mitch C. Amiano - Wed, 1 Jul 1998 08:27:46 -0400 (EDT) Kai Grossjohann - Wed, 1 Jul 1998 10:26:15 -0400 (EDT) Brandon Ibach - Wed, 1 Jul 1998 13:37:27 -0400 (EDT) Kai Grossjohann - Wed, 1 Jul 1998 14:20:53 -0400 (EDT) Bill Lindsey - Wed, 1 Jul 1998 12:47:16 -0400 (EDT) <= Paul Prescod - Fri, 3 Jul 1998 14:33:21 -0400 (EDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Kai Grossjohann	Thread	Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Paul Prescod
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Kai Grossjohann	Date	Defining widget flow objects (was R, Bill Lindsey
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >