[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: removing HTML flow objects?

Subject: Re: removing HTML flow objects?
From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 13:30:04 -0400
html and xtl
>>I don't think that the first point was as much of a boon as one might
>>think: the HTML flow object set supported was nearly useless for
>>pre-CSS browsers (such as the still-widely-deployed Netscape 3.0)
>>since it didn't include most basic HTML element types like <UL>.

The figures that I have heard is that by the end of this year less than 10%
of users will have a 3 or worse browser. With the next version of Opera
supporting CSS are be really going to allow a small percentage of users to
eviscerate what was once a promising new development? role on Spice!! The
Spice references can be found at

http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/spice
The original note on spice presented to W3
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-spice-19980123.html
A comparison of XSL and Spice
http://www.sil.org/sgml/spice-XSL980224.html

>There is room for a simple XML Transformation Language (XTL) sharing
>much of the structure and syntax of XSL -- you could use XTL to create
>XML, HTML, or even generalised SGML output

Agreed, but where is it.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: David Megginson <ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, May 22, 1998 10:54 AM
Subject: removing HTML flow objects?


>Ed Burns writes:
>
> > What's this about removing HTML flow objects?  The ability to
> > render XML/XSL into HTML is a major boon.  Also, the decision to
> > include HTML flow objects for ease of adoption was a sound one.
> > Please give me more info on this troubling development.
>
>I don't think that the first point was as much of a boon as one might
>think: the HTML flow object set supported was nearly useless for
>pre-CSS browsers (such as the still-widely-deployed Netscape 3.0)
>since it didn't include most basic HTML element types like <UL>.
>
>There is room for a simple XML Transformation Language (XTL) sharing
>much of the structure and syntax of XSL -- you could use XTL to create
>XML, HTML, or even generalised SGML output.
>
>
>All the best,
>
>
>David
>
>--
>David Megginson                 david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>           http://www.megginson.com/
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.