[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Style vs. transformation
Rob McDougall wrote: > > Section 6.3 seems a bit vague on what the mechanism for creating new > flow objects will be. Can flow objects be defined using ECMAScript? > Can flow objects be defined using native libraries? Jade just defines a bunch of flow objects corresponding to elements, entities, document types and so forth. Using them is a lot like report writing, except that instead of using print(), you are returning the strings and depending on the back-end to concatenate them into an SGML document (and of course you aren't working with actual markup, but with conceptula SGML or XML constructs). It would be very easy to create an XSL variant that did this too. Trivial, in fact. Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco [Woody Allen on Hollywood in "Annie Hall"] Annie: "It's so clean down here." Woody: "That's because they don't throw their garbage away. They make it into television shows." XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|