Subject: RE: James Clark on Schema
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:09:27 +0200
|
J.Pietschmann said :
>Interesting question: does the example above support the
>view that data types are actually important or the view that
>the only data type that really matters is "string" and
>everything else is optional?
Well I think it indicates that strings are a lot easier to structure.
Xml Schema seems to think so too, for example if I want to make my own
datattype for currency that can have a form #,###,###.## or #.###.###,##
I'm basically left restricting xsd:string by a regular expression - and
what fun that is.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: James Clark on Schema, (continued)
- Thomas B. Passin - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:16:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Wendell Piez - Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:30:03 -0400 (EDT)
- J.Pietschmann - Sat, 8 Jun 2002 15:21:39 -0400 (EDT)
- bryan - Mon, 10 Jun 2002 04:21:25 -0400 (EDT) <=
- David Carlisle - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Jeni Tennison - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Jeni Tennison - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Mark Wonsil - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:17:51 -0400 (EDT)
|
|