RE: James Clark on Schema
Mr. Melton concludes: > My conclusion is this: As bad as many observers and > participants think XML > Schema to be, it is appropriate for it to be the basis for > XQuery 1.0, > XPath 2.0, and XSLT 2.0. To hope that the various Working > Groups will "see > the light" and choose to use a schema-like facility defined > outside the W3C > is highly unlikely. An tremendous investment has already > been made in XML > Schema by many companies (including mine, of course) and I am highly > skeptical that they will toss that investment away lightly. Are you suggesting that if we build it, they will come? Instead of reciting the "good money after bad" line, I will leave you with this thought: Microsoft Bob/Office Assistant ;-) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format