Subject: Re: James Clark on Schema
From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:40:03 -0400
|
[Michael Kay]
>...
> I think the principle of matching on types rather than on names is
> sound, though. When XML is used in application integration scenarios the
> size of the vocabulary can reach tens of thousands of element and
> attribute names, but the number of types is typically much smaller. I
> think that being able to write template rules that transform a date, or
> a national insurance number, regardless of the name of the element or
> attribute that contains it, will be a significant benefit for people
> managing big integration projects. I've done some consultancy work with
> a Software AG client recently where it would definitely have been a
> help.
>
Aha, Architectural Forms through the back door, eh?
Cheers,
Tom P
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: Why XSLT?, (continued)
- Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:06:33 -0400 (EDT)
- Thomas B. Passin - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:50:10 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:16:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Wendell Piez - Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:30:03 -0400 (EDT)
- J.Pietschmann - Sat, 8 Jun 2002 15:21:39 -0400 (EDT)
- bryan - Mon, 10 Jun 2002 04:21:25 -0400 (EDT)
|
|