RE: New nntp news group for xsl-fo discussion

Ken Holman

> XSL-FO@xxxxxxxxxxx exists and is already getting active ... I 
> feel that 
> should suffice if it isn't acceptable to put everything on 
> this Mulberry list.

I have heard comments that fo's aren't in vogue on this list,
which is putting people off who want fo rather than XSLT discussion.

If volume is increasing, perhaps Mulberrytech might think again
about running a seperate list for XSLT-FO?

Regards DaveP

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list