Re: New nntp news group for xsl-fo discussion

David,

It happens to be an argument that is shared by many posters on the Apache FOP list. 

On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:45:03 GMT, David Carlisle wrote:

>This seems to be a dubious argument. There's more XSLT than FO on here
>at the moment because T has been a recommendation for ages and FO isn't
>a recommendation yet. Also there is already an FO list on egroups I
>believe. That's not to say another list/newsgroup is necessarily a bad
>thing, just that that particular argument isn't justification for it.



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list