• From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>,"xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 10:21:53 -0400

At 2016-11-04 12:13 +0000, Costello, Roger L. wrote:

Michael Kay wrote:

        When you compare it to the
        mess-that-calls-itself-a-standard
        by means of which this email
        reaches you, JSON is sparkling clean.

Fascinating statement!

Michael, what standard (or standards) are you referring to?

RFC-822: the "means of which this email reaches you"

. . . . . . . Ken


--
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training @US$45: http://goo.gl/Dd9qBK |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. _ _ _ _ _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ |
G Ken Holman _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mailto:gkholman@C... |
Google+ blog _ _ _ _ _ http://plus.google.com/+GKenHolman-Crane/posts |
Legal business disclaimers: _ _ http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |

• References:
  • Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of security risks andambiguities
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of securityrisks and ambiguities
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of security risks and ambiguities
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • RE: Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of securityrisks and ambiguities
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>