• From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:13:48 +0000

Michael Kay wrote:

  	When you compare it to the
 	mess-that-calls-itself-a-standard
 	by means of which this email
 	reaches you, JSON is sparkling clean.

Fascinating statement!

Michael, what standard (or standards) are you referring to? Would you provide an example (or two) of how the standard(s) are underspecified please?

/Roger

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of security risks and ambiguities
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • RE: Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of security risks and ambiguities
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• References:
  • Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of security risks andambiguities
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of securityrisks and ambiguities
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Stick with XML ... JSON is a minefield of security risks and ambiguities
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>