- From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
- To: liam@w...
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:39:10 +1000
See http://www.sgmlsource.com/8879/n0029.htm
The ISO standard details Xml in terms of SGML being careful not to appear as an alternate source
cheers
Rick
On Apr 12, 2013 8:16 AM, "Liam R E Quin" < liam@w...> wrote:
> I thought there were moves some
> time back in W3C to gain some kind of ISO liason status, or
> does it already have it?
Yes. We have PAS status, I think it's called.
> Will this ever likely lead to XML itself
> getting an ISO number?
Why? What advantage would we get? Are there significant markets where
XML is not used because it doesn't have a number from ISO and (more
importantly) where XML would be a net benefit?
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: http://irc.sorcery.net http://irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|