[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • To: liam@w...
  • Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:39:10 +1000

See http://www.sgmlsource.com/8879/n0029.htm

The ISO standard details Xml in terms of SGML being careful not to appear as an alternate source

cheers
Rick

On Apr 12, 2013 8:16 AM, "Liam R E Quin" <liam@w...> wrote:

>  I thought there were moves some
> time back in W3C to gain some kind of ISO liason status, or
> does it already have it?

Yes. We have PAS status, I think it's called.

>  Will this ever likely lead to XML itself
> getting an ISO number?

Why? What advantage would we get? Are there significant markets where
XML is not used because it doesn't have a number from ISO and (more
importantly) where XML would be a net benefit?

Liam

--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: http://irc.sorcery.net http://irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml


_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member