Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 19:19 +0100, Ihe Onwuka wrote: [...] > > every $t in //table satisfies ($t/thead and $t/tfoot) [...] > a) it's still an absolute path in XPath, //foo is equivalent to "foo anywhere in the document" so it is not an absolute path of the non-robust sort. > b) Just for the sake of argument I'll assume that it mitigates the > problem - is it practicable to expect or enforce that style of usage. You can't enforce intelligence. If your staff write bad tests, hire new staff. Changing tool-sets won't help with that. > Is it typical of XMLUnit code you expect to get written. Is it ever > likely to be. I think this is just an emotional rant and not productive. At any rate your utterance is not very grammatical and fails QA :-) The XQuery-based test framework idea idea in this thread is very interesting. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
