• From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• To: ihe.onwuka@g...
• Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:51:32 +0100

>> 
> 
> Right. But XMLUnit doesn't let you do that because it requires an
> absolute path (thank you John) to the node you are testing.
> 

I think it's quite powerful enough to write assertions of the form


every $t in //table satisfies ($t/thead and $t/tfoot)


and assertions like that are quite powerful enough to meet any unit testing needs that I've ever seen

Perhaps you're still thinking of the limitations of XPath 1.0?

Michael Kay
Saxonica

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>

• References:
  • Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Testing XML don't use xUnit
    • From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@g...>