• From: Philip Fearon <pgfearo@g...>
• To: Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 09:36:57 +0100

A tool calling itself an XML parser must treat XML errors as fatal.

A tool that corrects XML errors will be classified as something else.

An example of a parser that's tolerant of XML errors (so not an XML
parser) would be MindTouch's SGMLReader[1]. This is a parser that
implements the .NET XmlReader interface; if memory serves, there are a
few gaps in the implementation - because it specialises in handling
HTML.

[1] http://developer.mindtouch.com/SgmlReader

Phil Fearon
http://qutoric.com

On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...> wrote:
> Glad to have started a lively discussion but disappointed to have no real
> answer to my question.
> Do I take it that most mainstream parsers then treat any error as fatal?
> Joe
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...>

• References:
  • Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...>