• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: Philip Fearon <pgfearo@g...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:37:58 +0100

On 17/07/2011 09:36, Philip Fearon wrote:
> A tool calling itself an XML parser must treat XML errors as fatal.

No, only errors that are classified as fatal in the xml spec, not other 
classes of error (for which behaviour is explicitly undefined).
That was the original question in the thread, what do xml parsers do in 
practice with the freedom they are given by the spec?

David

• References:
  • Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@g...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...>
  • Re: Error and Fatal Error
    • From: Philip Fearon <pgfearo@g...>