Re: [ANNOUNCE] New MicroXML draft available
Stephen D Green scripsit: > If you want to allow attributes with namespace prefixes in MicroXML, > won't that mean the complexity of namespaces sneaks back in, e.g. > then having to provide an XML-compatible way to bind the prefix to > its namespace (with complexity over where the binding declaration can > be made - at head of document and/or on the element, etc)? Or would > it be that the prefix, though allowed in the attribute name, is just > treated as a special part of the name without any explicit binding to > a namespace? No, there are explicit bindings, though they are not required for well-formedness. But that doesn't add much complexity, because the binding is not represented in the data model, so it is up to the application to interpret it. The consequence of this is that if you move an element with prefixed attributes from one part of a document model to another (or one document to another), the meaning of the attributes may change. But this is the same as what happens if you cut and paste in the textual version, too. Namespaces are just fiddly and annoying, not complex. It's namespace fixup in order to maintain the pretense that the namespace of an element or attribute is an immutable part of it rather than context dependent, that's complex. -- John Cowan email@example.com http://ccil.org/~cowan You cannot enter here. Go back to the abyss prepared for you! Go back! Fall into the nothingness that awaits you and your Master. Go! --Gandalf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format