Re: XML Redux
On 22 February 2011 10:34, Andrew Welch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: ... > I'm more in the evolution not revolution camp - a simplified/subset of > xml, with improved tool support seems much more appealing than some > hybrid syntax. > I think this hybrid syntax comes as a *result* of having a simplified XML subset. We should still keep the subset - it is perhaps necessary as a precursor to readily include XML in JSON in some way (e.g. namespaces might add too much complexity to the latter). There might be a need to look a bit later at which of the possible subsets on the table best allows this hybrid. ---- Stephen D Green
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format