[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Redux

• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
• To: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:34:21 +0000

> {"field":<foo>This is a field</foo>}

or how about:

<field>
  <foo>This is a field</foo>
</field>

or even:

<foo type="field">This is a field</foo>

or if "field" isnt really the type of <foo>, but just a label:

<foo label="field">This is a field</foo>

:)

I'm more in the evolution not revolution camp - a simplified/subset of
xml, with improved tool support seems much more appealing than some
hybrid syntax.


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>

• References:
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
  • Re: XML Redux
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>