|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: MicroXML
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com> wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:01:11 +0700, James Clark wrote: I've only had a chance to skim ìXML (that would be a wikkid name :) ), but I intend to read more thoroughly when I get a longer break today. I hope my comments are not complete rubbish as a result.
With what Liam and Henri said about magic numbers, and I agree, how about just: <!DOCTYPE microxml>
No need for BOM since MicroXML is UTF-8 only, though I suspect there may be much discussion on that point. The MicroXML decl *must* be at the beginning (I agree the need for magic number trumps convenience for cut&paste. One can always add a step in the toolchain to fix misplaced microxml declarations.)
I think the above does not violate HTML5? (Not sure). I understand that HTML compat rules out: <?microxml?> -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/ Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








