How about a predefined root element such as "xmle"? Such an element name is reserved in XML 1.0, so should not be in general use for any application that is concerned with interoperability. Thus a document opening <xmle> could be processed according to the subset rules, with other documents processed according to XML 1.0. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Richard Salz <email@example.com> wrote: >> How do I tell whether it's safe to use my uXML parser instead of my >> (heavier) XML 1.0 + Namespace in XML + XML:Base + XML:ID + whatever >> parser? > > Does that have to be identified in the document, as opposed to out of > band? Â Such as application configuration, fallback on failure, HTTP header > :), etc? > > > -- > STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/ > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: firstname.lastname@example.org > subscribe: email@example.com > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format