Re: Towards XML 2.0
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:05:05 +0000 Andrew Welch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On 7 December 2010 14:42, David Lee <email@example.com> wrote: > > I'd even argue for a minimum *without attributes* and without mixed > > content, no DTD subset, no namespaces, and only UTF8 support. > > I've had to deal with "element only" xml and it's not that pleasant... ... > > I agree with no DTDs, no namespaces, UTF-8 only etc... mixed content > has to stay otherwise you may as well not call it xml. I'd surmise this is for document Andrew? What about machine produced XML? Anyone else favour a no mixed content? or is that a sub-sub set for the speed freaks? -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format