Re: Towards XML 2.0
On 7 December 2010 14:42, David Lee <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > I'd even argue for a minimum *without attributes* and without mixed content, > no DTD subset, no namespaces, and only UTF8 support. I've had to deal with "element only" xml and it's not that pleasant... instead of the usual: <item type="foo">value<item> you have the verbose: <item> <type>foo</type> <value>value</value> </item> and your xpaths go from: item[@type = 'foo'] to item[type = 'foo']/value ...so not great. I agree with no DTDs, no namespaces, UTF-8 only etc... mixed content has to stay otherwise you may as well not call it xml. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format