Re: Towards XML 2.0
On 6 December 2010 14:55, David Carlisle <email@example.com> wrote: > On 06/12/2010 14:36, Dave Pawson wrote: >> >> On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:50:57 +0000 > >> >> On which basis the only suggested improvement is to allow -- within >> comments. >> >> worth a try for simplification. >> >> thanks. >> > > Whether or not it's worth a try depends on what the ground rules are. > If there is a rule that every well formed xmlnext document is well formed > xml 1.0, then this is out of scope. A significant number of people (but > clearly not all) in recent threads have wanted that. See for example Jirka > here: > > http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/xml-2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-549222 There's a thread from earlier in the year discussing a simpler subset of XML which covers similar ground to this: http://markmail.org/thread/kxrg3tifg4k4fyj6 Looking back it received a fair amount of opposition... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format