Re: Towards XML 2.0
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Dave Pawson <email@example.com> wrote: > Easy test, how easy would that be to explain to a newbie? > Surely if you want XML 1.0, use it. The new work should remain new > and kept that way? Ease of explanation is one important criterion. Another, perhaps even more important criterion, is compatibility with existing tools. A big bang upgrade of all existing parsers, schema validators, XSLT processors, etc. would be a non-starter. If XML 2.0 can't fit into the existing tool chain, then there's no reason to make it XML at all. XML 1.1 foundered here, and the only thing it really changed was version="1.0" to version="1.1". (In hindsight, not requiring parsers to accept future version of XML was a mistake.) I can't see that allowing -- in comments is important enough to break the tool chain. If it were really that important, I'd suggest dropping comments completely and replacing them with <?comment text ?> but it's probably simpler to just leave them in as is, imperfect though they are. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold firstname.lastname@example.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format