Re: Towards XML 2.0
So you are suggesting that something that looks like an element is parsed differently to other things that look like elements? Is "can't expect well-formedness" entirely wise? On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Michael Sokolov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On 12/4/2010 10:39 PM, Ben Trafford wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 22:16 -0500, Kurt Cagle wrote: >>> >>> For a comment syntax, what's wrong with >>> <xml:comment>....</xml:comment>? >>> >>> But that's ... that's ... >>> >>> >>> That's actually a very decent idea. >> >> I'll third that. >> >> --->Ben > > metoo, but let's please allow for nesting this time. Extremely useful, and > not too hard to implement if you parse the contents of the comment loosely > (can't expect well-formedness, but can just search for </xml:comment\s*>) > > -Mike > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: email@example.com > subscribe: firstname.lastname@example.org > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format