• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:18:22 +0100

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 22:55:20 +0100
Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...> wrote:

> I don't have a problem with namespaces, neither do most people after
> some exposure to them and some simple tips.

But non XML authors do Andrew. 
  Simon hinted at it. Introducing authors to xml is bad enough
(all that crud around the text). Adding namespaces to it as well
is probably too much. 
  When MS Word can produce structured namespaced XML we'll
have solved the user| author problem, not the one that XML geeks
see.





-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>

• References:
  • To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David <dlee@c...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>