• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
• Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:46:11 +0100

On 7 April 2010 21:38, Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
> wrote:
>>
>> > I just hope people will actually evaluate the costs of using namespaces
>> > before automatically sticking them on everything.
>>
>> You can't go far wrong if:
>>
>> - You pick a namespace that will never change: don't use dates, or
>> words like 'proposed' or 'beta', or embed version information
>> - You always use a prefix
>> - You tell the team to always use an XML parser to read the XML, and
>> an XML writer to serialise the XML, and never ever process XML as a
>> string
>
>
> Ha!  Just Ha!
>
> You probably need to add about 100 items to your list.

Come on then, list them, it all helps.



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>

• References:
  • To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David <dlee@c...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>