• From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• To: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:18:25 +0530

IHMO, I find position() function ok as it is.

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...> wrote:
> sibling-position() - the position of the node amongst its siblings

I don't very much like this idea ... if we have a set of siblings
(say, elements), and I am at a particular context node, then count(. |
preceding-sibling::*) will give what sibling-position() you are asking
to do.

> document-position() - the position of the node within the document

I also do not like this idea very much ... I think the current tree
navigation mechanisms in XPath are sufficient (axes etc.).


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• References:
  • Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Ian Mayo" <ianmayo@t...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • RE: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>