• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:58:17 +1000

Michael Kay wrote:
>>> ...in XSD 1.0.  It's perfectly possible 1.1 isn't it?
>>>       
>
> Yes, in either of two ways. Either by defining an assertion on the type of
> the containing element, or by using conditional type assignment (where the
> type of the element depends on the values of its attributes).
>   
The conditional way does not seem to meet Ian's order constraint. So I 
think the assertions are the
only mechanism for XSD 1.1 for Ian's particular problem.

Cheers
Rick

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>

• References:
  • Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Ian Mayo" <ianmayo@t...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • RE: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>